Author |
Topic: which 200 to buy (Read 54 times) |
|
estudleon
Junior Member
member is offline
Posts: 5
|
 |
which 200 to buy
« Thread started on: Oct 9th, 2009, 11:40am » |
|
Hi guys.
I can buy al old mamiya sekor firs version DTL 3,5/200, and the last DX 3,5/200.
I need your help. Which is the better lens of both?
Thanks in advance.
|
|
 Logged
|
|
|
|
Herron
Site Owner
Administrator
member is offline
No burden is heavier
than a great potential!
Gender: 
Posts: 1909
|
|
Re: which 200 to buy
« Reply #1 on: Oct 9th, 2009, 1:51pm » |
|
on Oct 9th, 2009, 11:40am, estudleon wrote:Hi guys.
I can buy al old mamiya sekor firs version DTL 3,5/200, and the last DX 3,5/200.
I need your help. Which is the better lens of both?
Thanks in advance.
|
|
I think they are fairly comparable. They are both 4-element, 4-groups lenses. The DX should have a built-in lens hood, which could be in its favor, although some shooters prefer their own lens hoods.
The DX weighs a bit less (490g compared to 565g for the DTL). That might indicate lesser-weight materials, or thinner metal, but if they both seem to function well, I'd say the choice is yours.
What camera are you going to use them on?
|
|
Logged
|
Ron Herron
Photographer & Camera Collector
My Blog: Painting With Light
Travel Pix: Excellent Adventure
My Store: A P E R T U R E
|
|
|
estudleon
Junior Member
member is offline
Posts: 5
|
|
Re: which 200 to buy
« Reply #2 on: Oct 10th, 2009, 08:53am » |
|
I use only film. Mamiya 1000 dtl, fujicas and yashica C/Y cams.
The DX may be the Rolleinar for rollei 35 mm (made by mamiya too) with 4 elements.
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
